5HR01 Assignment Example
- April 2, 2025
- Posted by: admin
- Category: CIPD Level 5
Table of Contents
Assessment Questions
AC 1.1 Differentiate between employee involvement and employee participation and how they build relationships.
Employee Involvement
Employee involvement consists of organisational processes that involve employees in business activities and strategic choices to enhance their workplace involvement and work dedication. A management system activated through this approach enables workers to provide their thoughts and work alongside managers to fulfil business goals (Richason, 2025). It represents a range of processes that engage staff support, understanding, and commitment to organisational success (Villegas, 2022).
Building Relationships
Through employee involvement, organisations create relationships that build trust between employers and staff members, as well as respect and mutual dedication. An organisation receives stronger employee loyalty because workers who feel respected during team discussions create stronger bonds (Villegas, 2022). The engagement process creates better communication links between workers and leaders, which helps minimise conflicts while boosting teamwork (Richason, 2025).
Employee Participation
Through employee participation, people take part formally in decision-making processes in their workplace by establishing mechanisms of involvement. Employees gain access to policy and working conditions and operational decision influence through direct or indirect management systems, which affect their workplace responsibilities (Willemse, 2023). It serves as a process in which employees take part in organisational decision-making through collective bargaining alongside joint consultation and works councils.
Building Relationships
Through employee participation, organisations build stronger relationships by officially allowing staff members to influence management decisions. Such a system promotes fair practice, increased employee commitment, and employee ownership and responsibility (Grbović, 2024). Participation systems create motivated employees who fulfil their responsibilities better and become satisfied with their jobs with less conflict.
Differences Between Employee Involvement and Employee Participation
The decision-making influence in employee participation differs from employee involvement since management initiates the latter, while direct power lies with employees through unions or representative bodies (Grbović, 2024).
Employee involvement pertains to informal measures that enhance commitment levels, yet employee participation incorporates formal, structured processes for making decisions (Richason, 2025).
Suggestion schemes and team meetings fall under employee involvement, whereas collective bargaining represents employee participation together with joint committees and works councils (Grbović, 2024).
Employee involvement implements communication methods through feedback programs (Richason, 2025), while employee participation establishes employee participation on boards through legal procedures (Willemse, 2023).
The primary difference between employee involvement and employee participation is the formal authority granted to workers when shaping organisational policies. Although the two methodologies maintain separate employee relations functions, they provide valuable benefits to support workplace peace.
AC 1.2 Compare forms of union and non-union employee representation.
Comparison of Trade Union and Staff Council Representation
Employee involvement through representation is essential for maintaining worker voice during company decision-making. The two primary approaches for staff representation are trade unions that work with unions and staff councils that do not. Labour protection efforts between trade unions and staff councils differ fundamentally in organisational makeup, authority, and relative power.
Union representation-Trade unions
Trade unions function as independently operated employee organisations that advocate for wages, employment rights, and working conditions when negotiating with employers (Suff, 2023).
Non-union representation-Staff councils
A staff council is a non-bargaining employee group that assists organisation leadership in making policy decisions to improve workplace health and the work environment (StudySmarter, 2025).
Similarities Between Trade Unions and Staff Councils
Trade unions and staff councils uphold employee advocacy functions by defending worker issues while negotiating terms with management for improved working conditions. Staff councils act as intermediaries between the workforce and management, bringing forward workers’ suggestions and feedback (Suff,2023; StudySmarter, 2025).
Both organisations hold meetings with management, yet their degree of negotiation varies. Staff councils negotiate work environment policies alongside employee well-being, but trade unions primarily handle compensation terms and workplace rights alongside employment agreements (Suff,2023; StudySmarter, 2025).
The teams of both trade unions and staff councils work to resolve worker issues, which creates harmonious workplaces by decreasing conflicts among employees while boosting team morale (Suff,2023; StudySmarter, 2025).
Differences Between Trade Unions and Staff Councils
Legal Recognition and Bargaining Power
Trade unions possess legal recognition along with statutory rights, which allows them to negotiate collectively and utilise strike actions as needed (Suff,2023). Nevertheless, staff councils maintain a position as advisory roles that lack enforcement ability since they require voluntary employer support to function (StudySmarter, 2025)
Scope of Influence
Through their influence, trade unions establish national and industrial standards regarding employee wages while working on employment agreements, dispute resolutions, and labour policies. However, staff councils exist to manage workplace policies, employee well-being, and the day-to-day work environment within one organisation (StudySmarter, 2025).
Employer Relationship
Staff councils operate by seeking collaboration with management in their work, while trade unions sometimes maintain an adversarial posture during negotiations (Acas, 2024). Besides, staff councils work together with employers, but trade unions resort to industrial actions as a means of pressure (StudySmarter, 2025).
Comparison of Power and Influence
Trade unions’ bargaining power remains stronger when considering legal provisions and their capacity to conduct high-level negotiations for employment arrangements (Acas, 2024). Staff councils must depend on employer generosity for their decisions since they cannot enforce modifications (StudySmarter, 2025). Additionally, trade unions possess increased authority and legal recognition, which gives them more power than staff councils, which operate as consultative bodies that rely heavily on employer support.
AC 1.3 Evaluate the relationship between employee voice and organisational performance.
Employee voice describes how employees obtain the freedom to share their workplace opinions, concerns, and work-related suggestions (CIPD, 2024). Several experts and practitioners support the idea that employee voice creates positive effects on organisational performance, but others remain sceptical because of potential obstacles. The following evaluation includes both viewpoints preceding a decision that results from the analysis.
Arguments Supporting Employee Voice as a Driver of Organisational Performance
Enhanced Employee Engagement and Productivity
According to CIPD (2024), organisations foster better performance outcomes when employees are permitted to share their ideas. The act of listening to employees makes them more devoted to their work, which results in better productivity and advances innovation. Besides, research demonstrates that different viewpoints create superior outcomes when making workplace decisions. Through employee voice, organisations discover operational inefficiencies that they can resolve to establish an operational culture focused on constant enhancement (CIPD, 2024). For instance, the employee voice mechanisms at Toyota and other similar companies enable frontline operators to contribute their knowledge, which results in better quality and efficient performance.
Moreover, the implementation of Employee Voice systems leads to satisfied employees and lower turnover because they gain belongingness and experience fairness (CIPD, 2024). Employees who feel respected through employee voice programs demonstrate a higher commitment to staying in their current roles, which minimises the expenses associated with training new staff and recruiting replacements.
Arguments Questioning the Impact of Employee Voice on Organisational Performance
The practice of promoting employee voice generates both poor decision speed and organisational conflicts between managerial staff and their workforce, according to critics. Excessive development of consultation procedures slows down organisational speed significantly for companies operating in dynamic sectors, according to (De Jager, 2023). Research evidence also points to the fact that employee suggestions might not always meet organisational strategic requirements. The absence of strategic direction when allowing too much employee voice control leads organisations to face unrealistic demands and increased costs, which do not enhance performance (Kim and Cho, 2023).
Furthermore, a few organisations display employee voice mechanisms as symbolic practices instead of actual change-driving instruments. The improper handling of employee voice mechanisms causes frustration instead of engagement, which results in decreased morale and inferior performance (Kim and Cho, 2023).
AC 1.4 Explain the concept of better working lives and how this can be designed.
The Concept of Better Working Lives and How It Can Be Designed
Understanding Better Working Lives
Organisations should focus on designing better working lives by creating work settings that improve employees’ wellness and satisfaction with their jobs and overall quality of life. The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (2024) defines better-working lives as activities that give employees meaningful tasks and decent treatment, along with development chances and balanced personal and professional lives. Organisations that establish these aspects as priorities create improved employee well-being while also increasing productivity and employee engagement and minimising turnover.
Organisations need stratified methods to resolve workforce requirements while upholding business needs to create improved work circumstances. Strategies can be used to achieve these goals through flexible work setups and employee advancement opportunities across their careers (CIPD, 2023).
Flexible Working Arrangements
Adequate flexibility at work helps to achieve work-life harmony and higher employee contentment with their jobs. Flexible work arrangements empower staff to establish parameters for their working environment that diminish job-related pressure and enhance workplace performance (CIPD, 2024).
Key Aspects of Flexible Working
Remote and hybrid work systems enable employees to split their time between office and home locations, thus enabling better time management, eliminating work commute stress and enhancing work-life balance (CIPD, 2024). Organisations should establish flexible work hour systems, including flexitime and compressed workweeks and part-time employment, to help staff meet their child or education needs. Employers who offer job-sharing options together with career breaks help staff members build a life-work balance through their career development.
Impact on Better Working Lives
The CIPD (2023) carried out research indicating that flexible working produces more satisfied employees who miss fewer days of work while remaining at their jobs longer. The freedom to control their schedule enhances employee engagement and motivation, leading employees to demonstrate stronger commitment to their work responsibilities.
Employee Development and Career Progression
A thorough employee development plan provides people with opportunities to learn new competencies, develop professionally, and advance their careers (SHRM, 2024). To increase employee development levels, organisations should create training opportunities with mentorship and learning resources. Organisations should also create straightforward career pathway programs so their personnel can view their upcoming workplace advancement possibilities.
Impact on Better Working Lives
Employees gain increased motivation because they observe career advancement options. CIPD (2023) shows that organisations which spend on learning development create continual growth among workers, leading to superior performance results.
AC 2.1 Distinguish between organisational conflict and misbehaviour.
Differences Between Organisational Conflict and Misbehaviour
Organisational Conflict
According to Impact (2023), organisational conflict represents disagreements that emerge from divergent views about goals, values, and opinions. Conflict generates either beneficial enhancements or unconstructive tensions that bring stress and decrease productivity.
Key Characteristics of Organisational Conflict
Organisation’sConflict exists in an organization in two forms: it can drive functional results through innovation or drag down work efficiency (Impactly, 2023).
Viable solutions to resolve conflicts include mediation, negotiation, and conflict management strategies (Nibusinessinfo, 2018).
Misbehaviour
According to Taylor (2021), misbehaviour is deliberate employee actions that break organisational norms, ethical rules, or policy standards while producing workplace discord. Deliberate actions characterise the nature of misbehaviour, while conflict tends to happen without intentional intent.
Key Characteristics of Misbehaviour:
The actions usually serve to bring personal benefits to the performer or to express negative attitudes. The list of actions under this category includes theft, fraud, absenteeism, and workplace sabotage (Taylor, 2021). Management handles this issue through established disciplinary actions, policy implementation, and corrective measures.
Differences Between Organisational Conflict and Misbehaviour
Intent and Cause
The cause of organisational conflict differs from misbehaviour since it emerges through work-related differences between employees rather than intentional rule violations (Impactly, 2023). However, the events that lead to misbehaviour occur through deliberate employee decisions, while conflict emerges without deliberate intent (Taylor, 2021).
Result
Organisational conflict that receives proper management creates positive changes and innovation possibilities (Impactly, 2023). However, organisational effectiveness generally declines because misbehaviour has mostly negative effects on work environments (Taylor, 2021).
Resolution Approach:
Misbehavior is distinct from conflict because coherent problem resolution through negotiation or mediation remains inappropriate, necessitating disciplinary measures, policy revitalisation, or intensified supervision (Impactly, 2023; Taylor, 2021).
AC 2.2 Assess emerging trends in the types of conflict and industrial sanctions.
The changing nature of contemporary workplace environments influences the development of innovative patterns regarding industrial disputes and workplace conflicts. Two notable trends are:
Rise of Cyber-Aggression and Digital Misconduct
The workplace digitisation process has resulted in more frequent incidents of cyber-aggression alongside digital misconduct. Employees engage in various hostile behaviours when they use hostile emails, post defamatory content on social media and practice cyberbullying through instant messaging platforms (Pothuganti, 2025). The capability for anonymous and distance-based conduct that characterises cyber-aggression results in more serious psychological trauma for victims when compared to conventional face-to-face confrontations.
Recent empirical research found that workplace cyber-aggression affects a significant percentage of employees who face abusive emails and specific attacks through social media (Nakano, 2025). Such behaviours can occur more efficiently through digital communication systems, which also makes it difficult for organisations to detect and manage these incidents.
Management policies should undergo revisions to address digital misconduct because cyber-aggression continues to rise. The traditional resolution methods prove insufficient in dealing with cyber-aggression, so organisations must create special training to teach employees proper online behaviour while showing them the threats of digital harassment (Mukred et al., 2024)
Global Resurgence of Protective Industrial Policies Leading to Increased Industrial Actions
Economic uncertainties, together with geopolitical shifts, have caused worldwide protectionism through industrial policies designed to defend homegrown industries. Local economy support measures through protective industrial policies tend to create workplace conflict that fuels an uptick in industrial actions by workers (Reuters, 2024).
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) documented an international rise in state support measures that preferred domestic interests over foreign entities through state-backed grants, loans, and subsidies. Protective industry measures adopted by governments lead to rights-related conflicts between international suppliers and workers, which subsequently result in industrial actions (Reuters, 2024).
When organisations adopt protective industrial policies, they will experience rising labour unrest because staff members fight for proper labour practices and equal treatment. The number of disputes requires employers and employees to establish strong communication channels with policymakers to find solutions for the difficult situations triggered by such policies (Feingold and Torkington, 2024).
AC 2.3 Distinguish between third-party conciliation, mediation and arbitration.
Employment disputes in the workplace mainly stem from differences regarding terms of employment, disciplinary procedures, and interpersonal relationships between staff members. Organisations generally need outside assistance to handle disputes whenever internal approaches prove ineffective. The modern workplace uses three dispute resolution procedures – conciliation and mediation alongside arbitration – which exhibit different steps together with varying degrees of structuring and final results. All three factors, including employment term disagreements, disciplinary actions, and interpersonal disputes, may trigger workplace disputes (Gallo, 2022). The unsuccessful outcome of internal conflict creates a need for external intervention. The dispute resolution approaches of mediation, arbitration, and conciliation each exhibit different protocols, judicial structures and resolution effects.
Third-Party Conciliation
A neutral conciliator guides disputing parties to create agreements during voluntary third-party dispute resolution processes. During conciliation, a third party (conciliator) may provide guidance but will not force a decision upon the disputants (Acas, 2022).
Example
Employees who were dismissed can seek ACAS’s advisory services to help them reach a conciliation agreement with their employer before filing an employment tribunal case.
Advantages and disadvantages
Through cooperative discussions, employee relationships remain preserved because the process reduces workplace tensions. Besides, it helps in avoiding legal costs as it provides an informal and cost-effective alternative to litigation (Rabinovitz and Drummond, 2024).
Nevertheless, the process holds no binding power because employers and employees maintain independent decision-making freedom regarding recommendations, so reaching solutions becomes intricate (Rabinovitz and Drummond, 2024). Besides, conciliation has no assurance of success because all parties need to maintain their willingness to negotiate during the process.
Best Used When
In workplace disputes involving unfair dismissal, discrimination, and contract disagreements, conciliation should be used to secure solutions before employees take formal legal measures.
Mediation
During mediation, a private, independent mediator assists disputing parties in communicating and discovering solutions that both sides can agree to while maintaining full confidentiality. Parties work together to find their own resolutions, as the mediator abstains from presenting proposed solutions (CIPD, 2022).
Example
Two workers whose ongoing struggle at work has damaged their performance now turn to mediation to improve team dynamics and enhance their interaction methods.
Advantages and disadvantages
The process requires direct party communication, which creates better understanding and improves teamwork. Besides, mediation is confidential, safeguarding privacy to protect reputations from disclosure.
Nevertheless, mediation results in unreadable decisions when participants refuse to commit to any agreement (CIPD, 2022). In addition, the process may become manipulated by dominant parties because power differences affect the outcomes.
Best Used When
Mediation is most beneficial for interpersonal conflicts since parties can use this approach to resolve disagreements between managers and employees, issues among teams, and personality-related conflicts.
Arbitration
An independent arbitrator of arbitration proceedings hears the disputes of two parties and delivers a court-enforceable decision (ACAS, 2022). Compared to mediation and conciliation, arbitration follows a court procedure, moves through the process more quickly and costs the parties less money than court-based litigation.
Example
A trade union and employer who fail to reach an agreement regarding wage increases will seek arbitration to have an arbitrator decide the final salary outcome.
Advantages and disadvantages
Arbitration is legally binding since it ensures compliance with the decision. Moreover, it is faster than litigation. It reduces the time and expense of court proceedings (ACAS, 2022).
However, the parties cannot retain control over the arbitration process since they must accept every decision made by the arbitrator, regardless of its outcome. Also, the expenses for arbitration may stretch high based on how complex the case turns out to be (ACAS, 2022).
Best Used When
Arbitration functions best when organisations need a definitive resolution of formal disputes that must have binding authority, such as wage disputes, contract disagreements and collective bargaining disagreements.
AC 3.1 Explain the principles of legislation relating to unfair dismissal in respect of capability and misconduct issues.
Capability as a Reason for Dismissal
An employee demonstrates capability through effective work performance, which depends on their abilities and competency alongside their health status and skill and qualification level (Morris, 2023). According to Section 98 (2) (a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, employers can dismiss an employee on fairgrounds for capability problems when the employee fails to achieve job obligations (Legislation.gov.uk, 2025).
Example
Even after receiving training and support, if the staff member continually misses sales targets, the employer can rightfully dismiss the employee for failing to improve their performance after following an impartial performance management system.
Principles of Unfair Dismissal in Capability Cases
When aiming to prevent unfair dismissal claims, employers need to follow these steps:
Employers should conduct evaluation sessions while providing education and assistance to workers. The organisation needs to establish Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) as a strategy. Before dismissal, consider alternative roles. Organisations need to execute disciplinary and grievance procedures according to the ACAS Code of Practice guidelines (Morris, 2022).
The absence of performance improvement assistance in workplace disciplinary actions amounts to unfair dismissal, as per James v Waltham Holy Cross UDC (1973). The court determined that such a simple disciplinary action is unlawful (Relx, 2025).
Misconduct.
Employees who engage in improper conduct, contract violations, or breaking organisational rules are considered guilty of misconduct in dismissal situations. Discrimination can involve regular minor violations or extreme violations, including theft or violence (Morris, 2022).
Workers are dismissed after participating in a physical confrontation at their place of employment. Dismissal is likely suitable when employers execute proper disciplinary measures without prejudice.
Principles of Unfair Dismissal in Misconduct Cases
Section 98(2)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires employment dismissals based on misconduct to meet specific criteria.
The seriousness of the misconduct determines dismissal timing (angering an employee with gross misconduct leads to immediate termination). A dismissal process is fair when it includes investigation stages coupled with a disciplinary hearing. It should also be in line with ACAS guidelines (Legislation.gov.uk, 2025).
According to the court decision in Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd (1987) (Oakwood Solicitors, 2023), the employer failed to establish a standard disciplinary process, which led to an unfair dismissal.
AC 3.2 Analyse three key causes of employee grievances.
Unfair Treatment and Discrimination
When individuals within a workplace feel they receive unfavourable treatment or exclusion or experience favouritism, they regard this as an instance of unfair treatment. Several kinds of unfair treatment at work can occur, including discriminatory decisions during hiring or promotion, pay gaps between genders, workplace bullying or uneven disciplinary procedures (Tarika, 2024). The main factor leading to worker complaints stems from discrimination against protected characteristics such as gender, race, disability or age when employees experience non-recognition of their complaints.
The effects of mistreatment on employees extend to significant dimensions. Low workplace morale develops into decreased employee engagement and diminished productivity, while trust levels suffer within the organization. Staff who feel discriminated against often exercise their rights to sue their employers, which causes financial and reputational damage to their employers (Tarika, 2024).
Employers should establish detailed equality and diversity policies while using transparent processes for recruitment and all promotion and disciplinary procedures to stop grievances about unfair treatment (Sarma, 2019). HR professionals benefit from specialized fair treatment and unconscious bias training to establish inclusive workplace settings. The organization needs an effective grievance resolution process which allows employees to report their concerns before problems grow out of control.
Poor Working Conditions and Health & Safety Concerns
Employees in dangerous working situations face the most common grievances because they encounter hazardous environments, excessive workloads and insufficient equipment supply. Some workers choose to file grievances regarding their extended workdays, inadequate ventilation systems, lack of ergonomic office setups, and insufficient rest areas. Employees start to believe their well-being does not receive proper attention from their employers when health and safety regulations remain unmet (Tarika, 2024).
Unconducive working environment conditions result in employee burnout, physical injuries, and work-related illnesses, which produce higher absenteeism rates and decreased workplace productivity. Under severe circumstances, workers may pursue legal action that leads to payment demands and regulatory charges (Tarika, 2024).
Pay and Benefits Disputes
The main reason employees file grievances is their dissatisfaction with wage systems, payment delays, or unequal compensation. Staff who believe their compensation is insufficient compared to work colleagues and market rates alongside their performance levels tend to file complaints, especially if the organization lacks clear pay, bonus, and promotional criteria (Tarika, 2024).
Employees who experience unresolved pay disputes develop low motivation, which leads them to disengage from their work and seek jobs elsewhere. Unresolved pay and benefits grievances have the potential to result in both collective workplace disputes and industrial confrontations, affecting business performance (Tarika, 2024).
Companies that avoid pay-related grievances need to establish transparent pay and benefit procedures that are fair to everyone involved. Employees can maintain competitive pay through comparisons of regular industry standards and the practice of an honest pay structure, which helps build workplace trust (Sarma, 2019). Organizations that provide their workforce with salary review possibilities, together with performance-focused reward programs, help employees manage expectations while lowering the chance of disagreements.
AC 3.3 Advise on the importance of handling grievances effectively.
Proper handling of grievances has benefits such as;
Maintaining Employee Morale and Engagement
Organizational grievance management enables employees to maintain their feelings of being acknowledged and held in high esteem. Management’s serious commitment to listening to workplace concerns leads employees to enhance their work engagement, job dedication, and motivation levels (Medium, 2023). Employees become demotivated, producing less and showing less enthusiasm when their grievances are ignored or dismissed by the organization.
Organisational success depends on employee morale levels that are connected directly. The CIPD (2023) outlines that businesses with well-defined policies to handle grievances show greater job satisfaction and fewer cases of employee absences. A workplace environment based on employee trust fosters better contribution and role commitment from staff.
Organisations should establish measures to avoid workplace conflicts and related legal risks.
Unattended grievances transform into major workplace conflicts, which generate negative impacts on work-team relationships and cause the workplace to become emotionally damaging. Unresolved grievances force employees to use informal conflict resolution tactics, including spreading bad attitudes, developing different workgroups and skipping their assigned tasks. Failed grievance management directly reduces individual performance levels as well as disrupts teamwork operations, which negatively affects organizational productivity (Medium, 2023).
The improper resolution of grievances creates possible legal complications for organizations. When employees feel their grievances have received improper management or unprofessional handling, they may file claims at employment tribunals, which leads to expensive legal proceedings (Acas, 2022). UK employment law protects employees against unfair treatment through the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Equality Act 2010, so mistreating grievances can lead to monetary compensation and damage to an organization’s reputation.
Enhancing Organisational Reputation and Retention
An organisation establishes its employer reputation based on the way the company treats employees. Organisations which handle employee grievances effectively create a positive employer brand that both recruits high-end talent and maintains present personnel. Organisations that display fairness and responsiveness achieve a competitive recruitment advantage and keep employees because they build strong reputations for trustworthiness and friendly employee practices (Corlett, 2024).
A positive grievance-handling experience creates a secure environment for employees, which enhances their job satisfaction and decreases their desire to leave the organization. Organisations that mishandle employee grievances face multiple problems because dissatisfied staff members start looking for new positions. The organization will have higher recruitment expenses combined with additional training costs, which result in reduced financial performance (Corlett, 2024).
The Consequences of Mishandling Grievances
Organisational financial consequences and operational problems develop when management fails to effectively handle grievances. Two significant risks include:
Increased Employee Turnover and Low Productivity
Frequent instances of employee mistreatment combined with being unheard will lead workers to remove themselves from work activities or find employment elsewhere (Southey, 2023). Organisations that experience high employee turnover need to incur additional expenses dedicated to recruitment and new employee training programs. When grievances go unaddressed in workplaces, employees demonstrate reduced productivity while also losing their engagement due to feelings of support-lessness and dejection.
Financial and Legal Implications
The failure to address issues creates opportunities for employees to take legal action through tribunals that result in reimbursement payments. Organisations face negative publicity, which increases their difficulty in attracting employees as well as maintaining workforce retention (Southey, 2023). An unfavourable reputation of the employer drives off prospective job applicants leading to elevated recruitment challenges.
References
Richason, O.E. (2025). What Are the Benefits of Practicing Employee Involvement & Empowerment? [online] Chron.com. Available at: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/benefits-practicing-employee-involvement-empowerment-1842.html [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Villegas, F. (2022). Employee involvement: What it is & Why it’s important? [online] QuestionPro. Available at: https://www.questionpro.com/blog/employee-involvement/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Grbović, N. (2024). Employee Participation: Definition, Benefits, and Best Practices. [online] Heart Count. Available at: https://heartcount.com/blog/employee-participation/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025],
Willemse, Q. (2023). How Employee Participation Builds Relationships. [online] sharecouncil.co. Available at: https://sharecouncil.co/en/blog/how-employee-participation-builds-relationships [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Suff, R. (2023). CIPD | Trade Unions | Factsheets. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge/factsheets/trade-unions-factsheet/#TradeUnions [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
StudySmarter (2025). Staff Council: Definition, Roles & Laws | StudySmarter. [online] StudySmarter UK. Available at: https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/law/labour-law/staff-council/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Acas (2024). Acas guides on trade union and employee representation | Acas. [online] www.acas.org.uk. Available at: https://www.acas.org.uk/acas-guides-on-trade-union-and-employee-representation [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
CIPD (2024). CIPD | Employee voice boosts outcomes of management practices. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/bitesize-research/employee-representation/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
CIPD (2024). Employee Voice. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/voice-factsheet/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
De Jager, F.-M. (2023). Advantages and Disadvantages of Employee Voice in the Workplace. [online] Bucketlist. Available at: https://bucketlistrewards.com/blog/advantages-disadvantages-employee-voice/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Kim, T. and Cho, W. (2023). Employee Voice Opportunities Enhance Organizational Performance When Faced With Competing Demands. Review of Public Personnel Administration, [online] 0(0). Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0734371X231190327 [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
CIPD (2024). CIPD Good Work Index 2024. [online] Available at: https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/reports/2024-pdfs/8625-good-work-index-2024-survey-report-1-web.pdf [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
CIPD (2023). CIPD Good Work Index 2023. [online] CIPD. CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/reports/2023-pdfs/2023-good-work-index-report-8407.pdf [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
CIPD (2023). Flexible and hybrid working practices in 2023. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge/reports/flexible-hybrid-working-2023/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
CIPD (2024). CIPD | Flexible Working Practices | Factsheets. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/flexible-working-factsheet/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
SHRM (2024). Developing Employee Career Paths and Ladders. [online] Shrm.org. Available at: https://www.shrm.org/mena/topics-tools/tools/toolkits/developing-employee-career-paths-ladders [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
CIPD (2023). CIPD | Learning & Development Strategy and Policy | Factsheets. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/strategy-development-factsheet/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Impactly (2023). Workplace Conflict: Causes, Types And Steps To Resolve It. [online] getimpactly.com. Available at: https://www.getimpactly.com/post/workplace-conflict-causes [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Nibusinessinfo (2018). Causes of conflict in the workplace. [online] nibusinessinfo.co.uk. Available at: https://www.nibusinessinfo.co.uk/content/causes-conflict-workplace [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Taylor, T.C. (2021). Employee Misconduct: Common Types & How to Address It. [online] AIHR. Available at: https://www.aihr.com/blog/employee-misconduct/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Pothuganti, S.K. (2024). Workplace cyberbullying: a systematic literature review on its definition, theories, and the role of HRD. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2408443. [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Nakano, T. (2025). (PDF) Analysis of Cyber Aggression and Cyber-Bullying in Social Networking. [online] ResearchGate. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301710339_Analysis_of_Cyber_Aggression_and_Cyber-Bullying_in_Social_Networking. [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Mukred et al., M. (2024). The roots of digital aggression: Exploring cyber-violence through a systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(2), pp.100281–100281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100281. [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Reuters (2024). Global resurgence in protective industrial policies, EBRD says. [online] Brecorder. Available at: https://www.brecorder.com/news/40334473/global-resurgence-in-protective-industrial-policies-ebrd-says [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Feingold, S. and Torkington, S. (2024). Industrial policies are having a moment. Here are 4 examples to explain how they work. [online] World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/07/industrial-policies-geopolitics-economy-government/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Gallo, A. (2022). How to Navigate Conflict with a Coworker. [online] Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2022/09/how-to-navigate-conflict-with-a-coworker [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Acas (2022). How early conciliation works. [online] Acas. Available at: https://www.acas.org.uk/early-conciliation/how-early-conciliation-works [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Rabinovitz, I. and Drummond, J. (2024). Benefits of ACAS Early Conciliation for resolving workplace disputes. [online] Lexology. Available at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bc72a959-bc2a-4b2e-8a05-8c13902bf368 [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
CIPD (2022). CIPD | Workplace Mediation | Factsheets. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/mediation-factsheet/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
ACAS (2022). Arbitration. ACAS. [online] Available at: https://www.acas.org.uk/arbitration [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Legislation.gov.uk (2025). Employment Rights Act 1996. [online] Legislation.gov.uk. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/section/98 [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Morris, A. (2023). Capability Dismissal: Employer Guidance | DavidsonMorris. [online] Davidson Morris. Available at: https://www.davidsonmorris.com/capability-dismissal/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Morris, D. (2022). Section 98 Employment Rights Act Dismissals | DavidsonMorris. [online] DavidsonMorris. Available at: https://www.davidsonmorris.com/section-98-employment-rights-act/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Relx (2025). Dismissals for poor performance should present few problems if handled correctly | Commentary and insights | Tools | HR & Compliance Centre.co.uk. [online] Brightmine.com. Available at: https://hrcentre.uk.brightmine.com/commentary-and-insights/dismissals-for-poor-performance-should-present-few-problems-if-handled-correctly/114428/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Oakwood Solicitors (2023). Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd – Legal Landmark Case. [online] Oakwood Solicitors. Available at: https://www.oakwoodsolicitors.co.uk/knowledge/polkey-v-ae-dayton-services-ltd-legal-landmark-case/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Tarika (2024). Employee grievances: Everything HR teams need to know. [online] HR Blog | HR Resources | HR Knowledge Hive | Zoho People. Available at: https://www.zoho.com/people/hrknowledgehive/handling-employee-grievances.html [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Sarma, S. (2019). Employee Grievances: 8-Steps To Handle Them Most Effectively. [online] Nurture an Engaged and Satisfied Workforce | Vantage Circle HR Blog. Available at: https://www.vantagecircle.com/en/blog/handle-employee-grievances/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Medium (2023). The Importance of an Effective Grievance Management System. [online] Medium. Available at: https://disputeresolution.medium.com/the-importance-of-an-effective-grievance-management-system-0bb3fde2cc94 [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
CIPD (2023). CIPD | Information on Discipline & Grievance. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge/employment-law/discipline/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Acas (2022). Disciplinary and grievance procedures | Acas. [online] Acas. Available at: https://www.acas.org.uk/disciplinary-and-grievance-procedures [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Corlett, P. (2024). Why is it important to handle grievances properly? [online] Blake Morgan. Available at: https://www.blakemorgan.co.uk/why-is-it-important-to-handle-grievances-properly/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Southey, D. (2023). Handling Workplace Grievances with Expertise. [online] Kingfisher Professional Services. Available at: https://kingfisherps.co.uk/handling-workplace-grievances-with-expertise/ [Accessed 9 Mar. 2025].
Must Read:
